![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Drawing by Smartdraw |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Swapping an engine into a Komatsu is sort along the lines of putting lipstick on a pig.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() The fallacy of 'zero emissions..." You're being lied to... https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcell...tion-processes 99.9% of H2 if produced via natural gas reformation. aka blue Hydrogen. Green Hydrogen which uses electricity to split hydrogen from water, is not currently (pun intended) a viable option, we don't have enough electrical generation to support it.
__________________
Shade "Prepare to defend yourselves." -- Sergeant Major Basil L. Plumley, Ia Drang Valley |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What's so wrong with a Wabco....err Komatsu ?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They are actually built too strong and ridgid. They continuously crack, so they are constantly needing cracks gouged and repaired.
The Cat haul trucks crack as well, but the frequency and size of cracks are usually lower, and overall they seem to get more ‘uptime’ and a longer overall lifespan. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Somewhere (maybe "Design News" magazine) was an article explaining how CAT had changed from High Strength (T-100 maybe ?) to a lower strength steel for the main frame, to lower the amount of cracks in the field. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|