Because it is important to the left, to crush industries they don't like. They were successful with nuclear and have never forgot it, or how to accomplish it.
CO2 is not even on the playing field when you compare it to water as a global warming gas.
And mass migration is driven, not by China, but by Soros Open Borders Initiative. We have seen what open borders have done to Europe. No. No thanks.

I do it for several reason, one to get people like you who buy into the agenda to
try to think for themselves, honestly I am not very successful. But you can't fix
stupid, even with duct tape.

The brainwashing of the Europeans is much more thorough than that of us North
Americans, I am really enjoying Canadian News lately, hey is Dildeaux still in hiding?

Millions of years ago in the 4.5 billion year old earth is not a lot of time.

I don't have time to explain chemistry and physics to everyone... and I hate
typing. But hydrogen is a stupid solution, for what Gerry said and a 1,000
more reasons. Look up liquid Hydrogen and see what kind of energy that
takes.

Not even that 20-30 year return on investment is a looser big time. If it was
not for government paying for these systems they would never get built. When
tax payers pay for things it brings the worst quality, return on investment and
inflated price structures forward. Tax funding of private business is never a
good thing, it destroys value. Always has and always will.

Average EV battery life is 150,000 miles.
Average EV battery replacement is $30,000 (that is an old number, likely higher now)

So who is going to dump $30k into a new battery on a car with 150k miles on it? So are EVx lower carbon, not really, short life cycles.

the west has allowed so much industry to go to china a huge amount of their emissions is just making our stuff with cheap coal so the western countries can go "yeay we're good, china is bad". we're running out of places to dump on and they're catching up at a fast rate with nuclear and battery cars and reducing coal imports (although that's more political than environmental)

I love talking to parrots, you just parrot back the crap you have been fed.

1. Research C3 and C4 photosysthesis. C4 evolved to deal with low CO2.
2. Most of our editable crops come from plant that use C3.
3. In the past 500 million years what have been.
-- a. the average number of glaciers on the planet.
-- b. the average CO2 levels.
-- c. what are the average CO2 levels during ice ages?
-- d. what are the average CO2 levels in the inter glacial periords.


Then think about the simple fact we are still exiting the last ice age. We are not out of it yet. There are still ice caps and glaciers, which is not normal for earth.

Oh and a majority of scientists do not support global warming, also the data shows global temps have flat lined since 1998...

its grossly inefficient, the only way the math works out is if it's waste electricity when supply exceeds demand

I dont see hydrogen being trucked around in any form for a long time, the only customers its likely to make sense for are power stations that will burn the hydrogen generated when the wind isnt blowing/sun isnt shining. there's a hell of a lot of money being invested by the gas industry in figuring that out as they have the most to lose or gain as the gas fuel incumbents.

yeah, as I said, nature changes and nature adapts. people are the ones that are going to struggle.

what percentage of scientists do you say don't support global warming theory?

As I said above and before I don't know if man is contributing to climate change or not, but I think the costs of doing something about it and it being pointless are minor compared to the risks of doing nothing about it and having a catastrophe.

It's expensive energy and reduced economic growth for wealthy nations vs potentially displacing vast populations who's lands could become unsustainable.

I realise that's an idealogical position that is the opposite to what many on here hold, and I'm not looking to change your minds. I enjoy the debate and the learning opportunities and find the technological advancements that are taking place fascinating.